Cboe FX: LP competition to heat up

As banks re-enter the market-making fray, challenging non-bank liquidity providers

Bryan Harkin.jpg
Bryan Harkin: “We expect to see more competition in FX liquidity provision… and we believe this is good for the market as a whole”

Competition in foreign exchange liquidity provision will heat up in 2018 as banks re-enter the fray and compete more aggressively with non-bank liquidity providers, as the significant investments in their trading technology begin to bear fruit, according to Bryan Harkins, head of US equities and global FX at Cboe Global Markets.

“We expect to see more competition in FX liquidity provision [this] year, and we believe this is good for the market as a whole as spreads narrow and market quality

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact customer services - www.fx-markets.com/static/contact-us, or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.fx-markets.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@fx-markets.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to FX Markets? View our subscription options

Leveraging data in e-FX trading

In a world where electronic trading has infiltrated virtually every aspect of today’s FX market, having access to data and the means to interpret it are fundamental components of a successful e-FX strategy, writes Daniel Chambers, head of Data &…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a FX Markets account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: