US CFTC fines Chicago-based RJ O'Brien & Associates $300,000 for supervision failures
Chicago-based futures broker RJ O'Brien & Associates (RJO) has paid $300,000 to settle charges for supervision failures brought by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), on January 2.
According to the CFTC, RJO failed to supervise one of its guaranteed introducing brokers (GIB) and a member of staff, which were running an illegal trade allocation scheme between January 2003 and February 2007. The staff member was allocating, post-execution, profitable trades to his personal accounts, and unprofitable, or less profitable trades to either the GIB customer accounts or the GIB's commodity pool account held at RJO, the order found. Losses ratcheted up reached $183,000, the order stated.
In addition, the CFTC said, RJO failed to follow procedures it had in place concerning the placement of bunched orders by account managers. For example, RJO failed to ensure it always received a post-allocation plan prior to, or contemporaneously with, the GIB's staff's filing of bunched orders. The order also found that RJO did not employ adequate procedures to monitor, detect and deter unusual activity concerning trades that were allocated post-execution, or for supervision of its employees' handling and processing of bunched orders. This, said the CFTC, violated its rules.
The CFTC order imposes a $300,000 civil monetary penalty and an order to commit to following the CFTC rules.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact customer services - www.fx-markets.com/static/contact-us, or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.fx-markets.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact customer services - www.fx-markets.com/static/contact-us to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@fx-markets.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@fx-markets.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@fx-markets.com
More on Regulation
Doubts raised over new FX platform disclosures
New disclosure sheet template will require platforms to outline how they charge for data
The GFXC chair on the next steps for the FX Global Code
Gerardo García speaks about updating FX best practice, improving buy-side engagement and changes to the BIS’s triennial survey
India delays initial margin go-live date
RBI communicated putting off initial margin rules one day before planned November 8 implementation
New rate to give Philippine peso swaps a fillip, post-Isda add
Isda to include new PHP overnight rate and Indonesia’s Indonia in its next definitions update
Currenex loses US court bid to reveal XTX trade secrets
Judge also rules the venue must reveal its own matching code in class action case
Dutch regulator in new push on algo manipulation
AFM teams up with Oxford Uni academics to develop data models that will identify “harmful” collusion in automated trading
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
More disclosure touted to temper pre-hedging ills
Transparency could help investors choose a dealer, but will they use the disclosures?